![]() ![]() The search function is of standard speed and has features such as case matching, whole word, number of results, and page numbers of search progress bar. There is a sidebar teasing you with premium features but it can be hidden from view. All important tools are accessible without needing to click through toolbar tabs. ![]() One strength of Adobe Reader is that it has a very compact UI. It is an interesting choice that some might prefer, but it is worth noting that this does not work for Type 5 documents, whereas the area highlight feature bypasses this restriction. If the line drawn is straight enough, it will correct it to a horizontal or vertical rounded rectangle. Adobe Reader allows you to use the highlight tool but changes its behaviour so that it's basically a freedraw round brush. Other PDF readers will not let you use the regular highlight tool but offer an "Area highlight" tool instead which allows free draw of rectangles. One interesting difference between it and other software is in how it deals with Type 4 and 5 documents. Adobe reader is generally a good enough tool for what you would need to do, though it has its own quirks and drawbacks. This is probably everybody's first option since PDFs are automatically associated with Adobe. ![]() So without further ado:Īdobe Acrobat Reader DC: Compact functionality In addition, sometimes you also run into scans that are in the wrong orientation and need to be rotated, which requires its own tools. Scanned documents that cannot even be highlighted by Adobe Reader (might be some sort of protection) Scanned documents where the text is not recognised Scanned documents that have highlightable text, but the highlight and search seem to think the words are sometimes on different positions than they actually are, leading to highlights that run on from the line or skip portions of the text. Scanned documents that have accurately highlightable text To elaborate on "awkward files", what I mean is that student readings fall into five rough types: These requirements disqualify quite a number of the very light readers. All software chosen are also capable of signing documents and do not require signup. I focus on student-relevant details such as a good UI, highlighting, search, and the ability to handle all sorts of awkward files you might encounter. This comparison is written for university students and those in similar positions who want a free PDF reader but do not need the full features of a PDF editor. So I tested them out myself and made a writeup that I hope helps others in my position. The current web results for this are disappointing to say the least, with review sites doing very little to highlight what makes each reader unique and really comparing features people care about, not to mention frequently omitting major options. I've recently been doing a whole bunch of research into software for each purpose, and PDF readers are one of the staples. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |